Prognostic Indicators in Patients with Severe Head Injury: A 2 Year Retrospective Experience at Mayo Hospital, Lahore

Authors

  • M. Ashraf Shaheen Department of Neurosurgery,
  • ABDUL HAMEED Department of Neurosurgery,
  • MUHAMMAD IRFAN Department of Neurosurgery,
  • Kiran Niraula Department of Neurosurgery
  • M. Tariq Department of Neurosurgery,

Keywords:

Severe head injury,, prognosis, Glasgow outcome scale, Glasgow coma scale.

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health care problem in the western world and equally being pandemic in the developing world. It is one of the most common causes of death in young adults and it can affect people’s lives enormously. Since many years the prognostic indicators of severe head injury had been field of research. Knowing the factors responsible for poor prognosis and preventing them outcome of severe head injury can be improved.
Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted analyzing past records of the patients in department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Hospital from Nov 2011 to Nov 2013 with diagnosis of severe head injury (Glasgow Come Scale < 9). All patients except the patients with brain death, associated poly trauma, spinal injuries were excluded from the study. Total sample of 236 either managed conservatively or surgical and observed in Intensive care unit were study population. Prognosis was assessed with Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) on or before (if patient expired before 30 days) 30 post admission day. Age, GCS, CT findings, Pupils were compared with GOS to find probable predictors of prognosis. GOS of less than 4 was regarded as poor prognosis. Categorical variables like GCS, pupils, CT findings were presented in the form of frequency (percentage) whereas continuous variables like age were presented in the form of mean ± SD and median (range). Association between GOS and probable prognostic indictors was seen by chi square test.
Results: Out of 236 patients, 188 were male and 48 were female. Mean ± SD age of patient was 32.8 ± 14.6 years. Age group 15 – 45 years had maximum number of patients. Road traffic accident was major cause of severe head injury and majority had GCS 3 after resuscitation. More than half of the patient had bilaterally reactive pupils, 10% patient had post traumatic fits and half of the patients had features of base of skull fracture. 208 (8%) patient had abnormal CT findings. 30% patient on CT scan had closed cisterns and half of the patients has midline shift of 1.5 – 3 mm. More than 35% cases had surgical lesions over CT scan. Patients with age group < 15 years, GCS < 4, with closed cisterns, with surgical lesions and with midline shift of more than 3 mm had 30 day GOS < 4, which is regarded as poor prognostic marker.
Conclusion: Prognosis in patient with severe head injury is determined by age, presenting post resuscitation GCS, mode of injury, CT findings and surgical lesions.

References

1. Teasdale G, Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impair-red consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 1974; 2: 81-84.
2. Bullock R, Chestnut RM, Clifton G, Ghajar J, Marion DW, Narayan RK, et al: Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma, 1996, 13 (11): 643-734.
3. Bullock R, Chestnut RM, Clifton G, Ghajar J, Marion DW, Narayan RK, et al: Guidelines for the Manage-ment of Severe Traumatic Injury. J Neurotrauma, 2000; 17: 453-553.
4. Bullock R et al. Guidelines for the Management of Sev-ere Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma, 2007; 24 (1): S1-S106.
5. Chesnut RM. Secondary brain insults after head injury: clinical perspectives. New Horiz, 1995; 3: 366-75.
6. Unterberg AW, Stover JF, Kress B, Kiening KL. Ede-ma and brain trauma. Neuroscience, 2004; 129: 1021-9.
7. Abelson – Mitchell N. Epidemiology and prevention of head injuries: literature review. J Clin Nurs, 2008; 17: 46–57.
8. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol, 2008; 7: 728–41.
9. Ling G, Bandak F, Armonda R, Grant G, Ecklund J. Explosive blast neurotrauma. J Neurotrauma, 2009; 26: 815–25.
10. Baguley IJ, Nott MT, Howle AA, et al. Late mortality after severe traumatic brain injury in New South Wales: a multicentre study. Med J Aust, 2012; 196: 40–45.
11. Faul M, Wald M, Rutland-Brown W, Sullivent E, Sattin R. Using a cost – benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline: testing the Brain Trau-ma Foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma, 2007; 63: 1271–78.
12. Haddad SH, Arabi YM. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Med-icine, 2012; 20: 12. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-12 13. Treggiari MM, Schutz N, Yanez ND, Romand JA: Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care, 2007; 6 (2): 104-12.
14. Manley G, Knudson MM, Morabito D, Damron S, Eric-kson V, Pitts L: Hypotension, hypoxia, and head injury: frequency, duration, and consequences. Arch Surg, 2001; 136: 1118-1123.
15. Marmarou A, Ward JD, Young HF et al. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg, 1991; 75 (l): S59-S66.
16. Pietropaoli JA, Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Wald SL, Schmoker JD, Zhuang J: The deleterious effects of intraoperative hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head injuries. J Trauma, 1992; 33 (3): 403-407.
17. Muizelaar JP, Lutz HA, Becker DP: Effect of mannitol on ICP and CBF and correlation with pressure auto-regulation in severely head-injured patients. J Neuro-surg, 1984; 61: 700-706.
18. Shiozaki T, Sugimoto H, Taneda M, et al: Effect of mild hypothermia on uncontrollable intracranial hyper-tension after severe head injury. J Neurosurg, 1993; 79: 363-368.
19. Rapp RP, Young B, Twyman D, et al: The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head – injured patients. J Neurosurg, 1983; 58.
20. Carlsson CA, von Essen C, Löfgren J. Factors effecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. Part 1: Influence of biological factors. Part 2: Significa-nce of posttraumatic coma. J Neurosurg, 1968; 29: 242-

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

Issue

Section

Original Articles