Reconstruction of Large Meningomyelocele Defects with Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps

Authors

  • Yawar Sajjad Assistant Professor Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Salman Hameed Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Beenish Rahat PGR, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Keywords:

Large Meningomyelocele, Fasciocutaneous flaps, Wound dehiscence

Abstract

Objective: To determine the versatility and safety of local fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of large meni-ngomyelocele defects in terms of flap survival and dural coverage.
Materials and Methods: Meningomyelocele is a congenital defect in the vertebral arches with cystic dilatation of meninges. Closure of the skin defect in broad based meningomylocele is a challenging reconstructive problem. We present our experience of use of local fasciocutaneous flaps for coverage of skin defects in meningomyelocele patients. In this descriptive case series we managed 15 patients with broad based myelomeningocele defects in the Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery department Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from March 2008 to April 2016. The age of patients ranged from 4 days to 8 years. The diameter of the defect ranged between 8×5 to 13×8 cm. In all patients, reconstruction of soft tissue defect was done with local fasciocutaneous flaps. We performed Double Z-plasty in 2 (13%) patients, bilateral transposition flap in 4 (26%) patients, bipedicle skin flap in 4 (26%) pati-ents, unilateral long superiorly based flap in 3 (20%) patients, and inferiorly based flap based on gluteal perfo-rator in 2 (13%) patients. Donor site was primarily closed in 10 (66%) patients.
Results: In 5 (33%) patients flap donor area was skin grafted. Superficial wound dehiscence was seen in 2 (13%) patients. One patient (6%) had necrosis of distal part of flap which was managed conservatively. No neuro-surgical complication occurred post operatively. Average follow up of 2 years showed no recurrence or dural sac herniation in any patient.
Conclusion: Reconstruction of large meningomyelocele defects with local fasciocutaneous flaps provides safe and predictable outcomes and is the method of choice for most of the defects in the lumbosacral area.

References

1. Ersahin Y, Yurtseven T. Delayed repair of large myelo-meningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004; 20: 427-9.
2. K. Muramatsu, K. Ihara, Y. Imazyo, T. Taguchi, “Expe-riences with the “reverse” latissimus dorsi myocuta-neous flap,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006; 117: 2456–2459.
3. Campobasso P, Pesce C, Costa L, Cimaglia M.L.The use of the Limberg skin flap for closure of large lumbo-sacral myelomeningoceles. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2004; 20: 144-147.
4. McDonnell DE, Seyfer AE. In: Colon M, ed. Mastery of plastic surgery. Boston: Little, Brown, 1994: 1240.
5. Patterson TJ. The use of rotation flaps following excis-ion of lumbar myelomeningoceles: an aid for the clo-sure of large defects. Br J Surg. 1959; 46: 606–608.
6. Ozveren M.F., Erol F.S., Akdemir I. The significance of the defect size in spina bifida cysticain determination of the surgical technique. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2002; 18: 614-20.
7. Hayashi A, Maruyama Y. Bilateral latissimus dorsi V-Y musculocutaneousflap for closure of a large menin-gomyelocele. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 88: 520 –523.
8. McCraw J.B., Penix J.O. and Baker J.W.: Repair of major defects of the chest wall and spine with the lati-ssimusdorsimyocutaneous flap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1978; 62: 197-204.
9. Ramirez OM, Ramasastry SS, Granick MS, et al. A new surgicalapproach to closure of large lumbosacral meningomyelocele defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987; 80: 799–809.
10. Lacobucci J. Marks M.W. and Argenta L.C: Anatomic and clinical experience with fasciocutaneous flap clo-sure of large myelomeningoceles. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1996; 97: 1400.
11. Y. Zakaria and E. A.Hasan, “Reversed turnover latis-simus dorsi muscle flap for closure of large myeloma-ningocele defects,”Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2010; 63: 1513–1518.
12. Luce EA, Walsh J. Wound closure of the myelomenin-
gocoele defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 75: 389 –393.
13. Bajaj PS, Welsh F, Shadid EA. Versatility of lumbar transposition flaps in the closure of meningomyelocele skin defects. Ann Plast Surg. 1979; 2: 103–108.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-03

Issue

Section

Original Articles