Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture

Authors

  • Attique-Ur- Rehman Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Ijaz Hussain Wadd Senior Registrar Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Mukhtiar Ahmed Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Anjum Habib Vohra Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Shahzad Shams Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Keywords:

Osteoporosis, Spine fractures, vertebroplasty, pain relief

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of single level Osteo-porotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCF). Study Design: This was a case series study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Neurosurgery Unit I, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore from Jan-uary 2012 to January 2014.
Methodology: All 57 patients received PVP in the current study. Feasibility of a unilateral approach was judged before surgery using the 64 – slice helical computed tomography (CT) multiplanar reconstruction technique, a 3D accurate puncture plan was then determined. The skin bone distance, puncture angle and needle insertion depth were recorded during surgery. 2D CT rechecking was performed for any complication at day 1 after operation. Preoperative and postoperative numerical data were compared patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were given time in the out – patient department for vertebroplasty. Patients who had a neoplastic etiology (meta-stasis or myeloma), infection, neural compression, traumatic fracture, neurological deficit, spinal stenosis, severe degenerative diseases of the spine or previous surgery at the involved vertebral body were excluded from our study. Prior to vertebroplasty the patient’s level of pain was recorded by using the visual analogue scale method: a scale of 0 – 10, with 10 indicating the most pain. After vertebroplasty, patients were asked whether their pain was completely relieved, partially relieved, unchanged, or worse. The post vertebroplasty visual analogue scale score were recorded on the day of vertebroplasty immediately after the end of the procedure and at 24 hours and then at the follow up visits at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year intervals.
Results: In this study there were 20 (35.1%) male and 37 (64.9%) female patients. The mean age of patients was 59.12 ± 12.40 years with minimum and maximum age 39-88 years respectively. On pre procedure assessment, fractures of L1, L2 and L3 were seen in 10 (17.5%), 6 (10.5%) and 5 (8.8%) respectively while T11 and T12 were seen in 6 (10.5%) and 16 (28.15%) respectively. Mean pre and postoperative pain on VAS was 7.91 ± 1.17 and 1.17 ± 1.45. After surgery mean difference in pain score was 6.73 ± 1.90 with fulfillment of normality assumptions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z = 1.18, p-value = 0.123). On applying paired sample t-test significant improvement in pain was found after surgery, t=26.71, p-value < 0.001. Mean cement volume and vertebral collapse was 6.42 ± 1.60 and 29.29 ± 4.19 respectively.
Conclusion: Vertebroplasty is safe and effective procedure for osteoporotic vertebral collapse and its a day care procedure and can be performed safely under local anaesthesia.

References

1. Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, Lunt M, Armbrecht G, Ismail AA, et al. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Eur-ope: Results from the European Prospective Osteoporo-sis Study (EPOS) J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17: 716–24.
2. Dennison E, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Horm Res. 2000; 54 Suppl. 1: 58–63.
3. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D. A method for certain spinal angiomas: percutaneous vertebro-plasty with acrylic cement. Neurochirurgie 1987; 33: 166-168.
4. Deramond H, Darrasson R, Galibert P. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrytic cement in the treatment of aggressive spinal angiomas. Rachis 1989; 1: 143-153.
5. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 569–579.
6. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C et al. A randomized trial of ver-tebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 557–56.
7. Voormolen MH, Mali WP, Lohle PN, Fransen H, Lam-pmann LE, van der Graaf Y, et al. Percutaneous verteb-roplasty compared with optimal pain medication treat-ment: short – term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral com-pression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar; 28 (3): 555-60.
8. Allegretti L, Mavilio N, Fiaschi P, Bragazzi R, Pacetti M, Castelletti L, et al. Intra-operative vertebroplasty combined with posterior cord decompression. A report of twelve cases. Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct. 31; 20 (5): 583-90.
9. Kaemmerlen P, Thiesse P, Jonas P, et al. Percutaneous injection of orthopedic cement in metastatic vertebral lesions. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 121.
10. Cotten A, Boutry N, Cortet B, et al. Percutaneous ver-tebroplasty: state of the art. RadioGraphics, 1998; 18: 311-320.
11. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, Rose M, Sola-Martinez T, Enkaoua E. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology, 1996; 199: 241-247.
12. Lin EP, Ekholm S, Hiwatashi A, Westesson PL. Ver-tebroplasty: Cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 175–80.
13. Peh WC, Gilula LA, Peck DD. Percutaneous vertebro-plasty for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compres-sion fractures. Radiology, 2002; 223: 121–6.
14. Gilula L. Is insufficient use of polymethylmethacrylate a cause for vertebroplasty failure necessitating repeat vertebroplasty? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24: 2120–2.
15. Cyteval C, Sarrabere MP, Roux JO, et al. Acute osteo-porotic vertebral collapse: open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement in 20 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173: 1685-1690.
16. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM. Percuta-neous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabi-lization. Spine, 2000; 25: 923-928.
17. Heini PF, Wälchli B, Berlemann U. Percutaneous trans-pedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: Operative tech-nique and early results. A prospective study for the tre-atment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Eur Spi-ne J. 2000; 9: 445–50.
18. Lin EP, Ekholm S, Hiwatashi A, Westesson PL. Ver-tebroplasty: Cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 175–80.
19. Knavel EM, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF. Vertebroplasty for the treatment of traumatic nonosteoporotic compres-sion fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 323–327.
20. Tender GC, Serban D. Traumatic spinal fracture treated by vertebroplasty: a case report.J Med Case Rep. 2012; 6: 390.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Original Articles