Comparison of Frequency of Recurrence after Burr Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma with or without Subdural Drain.

Authors

  • TALHA ABBAS Independent University Hospital Marzi Pura Narr Wala Road, Faisalabad
  • MUHAMMAD ABDUR REHMAN Senior Registrar Neurosurgery Allied Hospital Faisalabad
  • NABEEL CHOUDHARY Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore – Pakistan
  • TAIMOOR ANWAR Department of Neurosurgery, Allied Hospital
  • ANJUM WAHAB Department of Neurosurgery, Allied Hospital
  • Qura Tul Ain Tariq Department of Neurosurgery, Allied Hospital

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v24i1.380

Keywords:

Chronic subdural hematoma, burr hole evacuation, subdural drain, recurrence

Abstract

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is known to have a significant recurrence rate. The rate of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after surgery ranges from roughly 5% to 30%.  Burr hole evacuation without drainage is performed as a first line of treatment for CSDH. As there is controversy in literature regarding the use of drainage after burr hole evacuation, the results of my study may be helpful for selecting a proper treatment modality as a first line of treatment for CSDH in terms of recurrence.

The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of recurrence after burr hole evacuation of CSDH with and without subdural drain. It was a randomized controlled trial conducted in Department of Neurosurgery, Allied hospital, Faisalabad form Aug 2016 to Aug 2018

RESULTS:In our study, out of 130 cases(65 in each group). 84.62%(n=55) in Group-A and 76.92%(n=50) in Group-B were between above 40 years of age whereas 15.38%(n=10) in Group-A and 23.08%(n=15) were between 18-40 years of age, mean+sd was calculated as  64.03+7.61 years in Group-A and 62.28+7.83 years in Group-B, 78.46%(n=51) in Group-A and 72.31%(n=47) in Group-B were male while 21.54%(n=14) in Group-A and 27.69%(n=18) in Group-B were females, comparison of frequency of recurrence after burr hole evacuation of CSDH with and without subdural drain shows 10.77%(n=7) in Group-A and 27.69%(n=18) in Group-B, p value was 0.01 showing a significant difference.

CONCLUSION: We concluded that the frequency of recurrence after burrhole evacuation of CSDH is significantly lower with drain when compared without subdural drain.

References

1. Regan JM, Worley E, Shelburne C, Rullerkat R, Watson JC. Burr hole washout versus craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma: patient outcome and cost analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:eo115085.
2. Rusconi A, Sangiorgi S, Bifone L, Balbi S. Infrequent hemorrhagic complications following surgical drainagebof chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;57:379-85.
3. Rovlias A, Theodorpoulos S, Papoutsakis D. Chronic subdural hematoma: surgical management and outcome in 986 cases: a classification and regression tree approach. Surg Neurol lnt. 2015;6:127.
4. Kim GH. Kim BT, lm SB, Hwang SC, Jeong JH. Shin DS. Comparison of the indications and treatment results of burr-hole drainage at the maximal thickness area versus twist-drill craniostomy at the pre-coronal point for the evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56:243-7.
5. Balser D, Rodgers SD, Johnson B, Shi C, Tabak E, Samadani U. Evolving management of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma: experience of a single institution and review of the literature. Neurol Res. 2013;35:233-42.
6. Kutty SA, Johny M. Chronic subdural hematoma: a comparison of recurrence rates following burr-hole craniostomy with and without drains. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24:494-7.
7. Singh AK, Suryanarayanan B', Choudhary A, Prasad A, Singh S, Gupta LN. A prospective randomized study of use of drain versus no drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurol India. 2014;62:169-74.
8. Javadi A. Amirjamshidi A, Aran S, Hosseini SH. A randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of burr-hole irrigation with and without drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a preliminary report. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:731-6.
9. Santarius T, Kirkpatrick PJ, Ganesan D, Chia HL, Jalloh I, Smielewski P. Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1067–73.
10. Carlsen JG, Cortnum S, Sørensen JC. Recurrence of chronic subdural haematomata with and without post-operative drainage. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25:388–90.
11. Ramachandran R, Hegde T. Chronic subdural hematomas: Causes of morbidity and mortality. Surg Neurol. 2007;67:367–72.
12. Wakai S, Hashimoto K, Watanabe N, Inoh S, Ochiai C, Nagai M. Efficacy of closed-system drainage in treating chronic subdural hematoma: A prospective comparative study. Neurosurgery. 1990;26:771–3.
13. Tsutsumi K, Maeda K, Iijima A, Usui M, Okada Y, Kirino T. The relationship of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings and closed system drainage in the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:870–5.
14. Gurelik M, Aslan A, Gurelik B, Ozum U, Karadag O, Kars HZ. A safe and effectivemethod for treatment of chronic subdural haematoma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2007;34:84–7.
15. Sarnvivad P, Chiewchanvechakul W, Chumnanvej S. Chronic subdural hematoma: Drainage vs. no drainage. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94:1352–6.
16. Javadi A, Amirjamshidi A, Aran S, Hosseini SH. A randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of burr-hole irrigation with and without drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A preliminary report. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:731–6.
17. Ahmed S, Agrawal D, Kale SS, Mahapatra AK. A comparative study of treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: Burr hole drainage versus continuous closed drainage. TheIndian Journal of Neurotrauma. 2011;8:17–24.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-11

Issue

Section

Original Articles