Outcome of Anterior Fixation in Lower Cervical Spine Injuries

Authors

  • Dr. Khurram Ishaque Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Dr. Amir Aziz Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Dr. Zubair Ahmed Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Dr. Yaser-ud-Din Hoti Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore
  • Dr. Tariq Salah ud din Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Keywords:

Cervical spine, anterior fixation, cervical spine locking plate, ligaments

Abstract

Introduction: The fractures of cervical spine are divided into upper cervical spine (C1 – C2) and lower cervical spine (C3 – C7) fractures, also called sub-axial cervical spine. Sub-axial cervical injuries rangesfrom minor ligamentous strain or spinous process fracture to complete fracture dislocation with bone and ligament disruption, resulting in severe spinal cord injury.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of anterior cervical spine fixation as regards the effective stabilization, immobilization and solid bony fusion in lower cervical spine injuries by the use of cervical spine locking plate (CSLP) attached with cancellous screws.

Study Design: Descriptive case series study.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted from March 2013 to March 2014 in the department of Neurosurgery unit II, Lahore General Hospital Lahore. A total of 30 patients were included in this study of both gender and in the age range of 16 – 60 years.

Results: In our study, there were 23 (76.7%) male patients and 7 (23.3%) female patients. The majority of the patients 25 (83.3%) were in the age range of 21 – 50 years with mean age was 38.2 ± 11.7 years. On one month follow up, the mean Frankel grade was 3.5 ± 1.6, 3.53 ± 1.6 on 3 months follow up and 3.6 ± 1.8 on 6 months follow-up. Similarly, 12 (40%) patients remained catheterized, 16 (53.3%) patients had normal control and 2 (6.7%) patients had partial recovery in 1 month time. After 3 months, 4 (13.3%) patients remained catheterized, 20 (66.7%) patients had normal control and 6 (20%) patients had partial recovery. After 6 months 3 (10%) patients remained catheterized, 25 (83.3%) patients had normal control and 2 (6.7%) had partial recovery. On follow up of one, three and six months, x-ray finding showed in 9 (30%) patients of good condition and 21 (70%) patients of satisfactory condition. Conclusion: The use of anterior approach in treatment of the injured lower spine is safe and effective.

Abbreviations: CSLP = cervical spine locking plate.

Author Biographies

Dr. Khurram Ishaque, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Department of Neurosurgery 

Dr. Amir Aziz, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Department of Neurosurgery 

Dr. Zubair Ahmed, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Department of Neurosurgery 

Dr. Yaser-ud-Din Hoti, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Department of Neurosurgery 

Dr. Tariq Salah ud din, Unit II, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore

Department of Neurosurgery 

References

1. Shaukat A, Ahmad G, AnjumMN. Cervical spine trauma x-ray interpretation pictorial review. Pak J Radiol. 2003; 15: 26-37.
2. Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR, Grauer JNM, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF. Subaxial cervical spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14: 78-89.
3. Afridi HK, Khichi ZH, Aziz K. Medical and socioeconomic aspects of road traffic accidents. Ann King Edward Med Coll. 2006; 12: 310-11.
4. Bashir F, Malik A, Abaidullah S. Complications developed in spinal cord injured and physiotherapy. Ann King Edward Med Coll. 2001; 7: 61-3.
5. Leventhal MR. Fractures, dislocations, and fracturedislocations of spine. In: Canale ST. Campbell’s operaive orthopaedics. 10th ed. USA: Mosby; 2003: 1597- 1690.
6. Bailey RW, Badgley GE. Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg A. 1960; 42: 565–594.
7. Smith EW. The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958; 40A (3): 607–624.
8. Cloward RB. Treatment of acute fractures and fracture - dislocations of the cervical Spine by vertebral – body fusion: a report of eleven cases. J Neurosurg. 1961; 18: 201–209.
9. Verbiest H. Anterior-lateral operations for fractures and dislocations in the middle and lower parts of the cervical spine: report of a series of forty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg A. 1969; 51 (8): 1489–1530.
10. Böhler J, Gaudernak T. Anterior plate stabilization for fracture dislocation of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma. 1980; 20: 203–205.
11. Orozco Delcos R, Deldos R, Llovet TJ. Osteosysthesisen las fracturas de raguis cervical: nota de technica. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 1970; 14: 285–288.
12. Sénégas J, Gauzière JM. In defence of anterior surgery in the treatment of serious injuries to the last 5 cervical vertebra. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1976; 62 (2 suppl.): 123–128.
13. Aebi M, Webb J. The spine. In: Müller ME, editor. Manual of internal fixation. 3. Berlin: Springer; 1991.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-23

Issue

Section

Original Articles