Modified Nakaguchi Classification: Is it a New Way to Measure Outcome of Chronic Subrural Hematoma through GCOSE?

Authors

  • Muzafar Ali Bhand Department of Neurosurgery Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro
  • Sanaullaha Pathan Department of Neurosurgery Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro
  • Hameedullah Khan Department of Neurosurgery Indus Medical College, Tando Muhammad Khan – Pakistan
  • Peer Asad Aziz Department of Neurosurgery Bilawal Medical Collage, Jamshoro
  • Wafa Hyder Department of Internal Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore
  • Arsalan Mehmood Department of Neurosurgery Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro
  • Zeeshan Nasir Department of Neurosurgery Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS), Jamshoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v28i4.1052

Keywords:

Modified Nakaguchi classification, CSDH

Abstract

Objective:  The ? value of the Modified Nakaguchi classification is 0.78, the highest from other available classification systems for CSDH. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of CSDH concerning the type of CSDH according to the modified Nakaguchi classification.

Material and Methods:  It is a single cohort study conducted at Liaquat University Hospital Hyderabad and Jamshoro in the Neurosurgical Department. The patient's known case of chronic subdural hematoma was included in the study after evaluation of inclusion and exclusion criteria and variables like type of CSDH and GCS and GCOSE on discharge were noted on the pre-designed Questionnaire.

Results:  A total number of 63 patients were included in the study, with 69.8% being male and 30.2% female, and the overall mean age was 58.3 years. The most common presentation according to the Modified Nakaguchi Classification was Hypo-dense (30%) and Graded (27%) type. The mean pre-operative GCS was 10.98 and the post-operative GCS mean was 12.87 with a significance of 0.001. A total of 50.8% of patients had upper good recovery on Discharge GCOSE out of which 28.13% of Hypodense and Graded type. Total mortality was 22.2% out of which 28.6% was hypodense and Graded type respectively. The recurrence of CSDH was 11.1% and the most common type was Hypodense (57%).

Conclusion:  The Modified Nakaguchi Classification doesn’t define the outcome significantly, however, the surgical intervention related to its specific type is significantly associated with the outcome of the patient on the Glasgow coma outcome scale extended.

References

Macdonald RL. Pathophysiology of Chronic subdural hematoma. Youmans and Winn Neurological Surgery 01. seventh edition ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 304-9.

Aswin Chari AGK, Nicholas Borg, Peter J. hutchinson, Thomas Santarius. Medical and Surgical Managment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma. In: Winn HR, editor. Youmans and Winn Neurological surgery. 1. 7th ed. Philadelphia: ELSEVIER; 2017.

Rauhala M, Helén P, Huhtala H, Heikkilä P, Iverson GL, Niskakangas T, et al. Chronic subdural hematoma-incidence, complications, and financial impact. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(9):2033-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04398-3:

Takei J, Hirotsu T, Hatano K, Ishibashi T, Inomata T, Noda Y, et al. Modified Computed Tomography Classification for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Features Good Interrater Agreement: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. World Neurosurgery. 2021;151:e407-e17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.052:

Kwon CS, Al-Awar O, Richards O, Izu A, Lengvenis G. Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A New Scoring System. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:e707-e14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.058:

Katiyar V, Vora Z, Agarwal S, Sharma R, Gurjar H. Prognostic Scoring for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Is Decision Making Easier? World Neurosurg. 2018;116:481.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.056:

Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-6.

DOI: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232:

Chari A, Hocking KC, Broughton E, Turner C, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Reported Outcomes. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(13):1212-9. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.3983:

Jain S, Iverson L. Glasgow Coma Scale (2020) In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2021.

Wilson L, Boase K, Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Giacino JT, Markowitz AJ, et al. A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview. J Neurotrauma. 2021;38(17):2435-46.

DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7527:

Nouri A, Gondar R, Schaller K, Meling T. Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH): A review of the current state of the art. Brain & spine. 2021;1:100300. 10.1016/j.bas.2021.100300:

Blaauw J, Jacobs B, den Hertog HM, van der Gaag NA, Jellema K, Dammers R, et al. Neurosurgical and Perioperative Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Front Neurol. 2020;11:550. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00550:

Hamou H, Alzaiyani M, Pjontek R, Kremer B, Albanna W, Ridwan H, et al. Risk factors of recurrence in chronic subdural hematoma and a proposed extended classification of internal architecture as a predictor of recurrence. Neurosurgical review. 2022;45(4):2777-86.

DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01790-8:

Nakaguchi H, Tanishima T, Yoshimasu N. Factors in the natural history of chronic subdural hematomas that influence their postoperative recurrence. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):256-62.

DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0256:

Ahmed OEF, El-Sawy A, El-Molla S. Surgical management of chronic subdural hematomas through single-burr hole craniostomy: is it sufficient? The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2021;57(1):136.

DOI: 10.1186/s41983-021-00368-3:

Aljabali A, Sharkawy AM, Jaradat B, Serag I, Al-Dardery NM, Abdelhady M, et al. Drainage versus no drainage after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1961 patients. Neurosurgical review. 2023;46(1):251. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02153-7:

Posti JP, Luoto TM, Sipilä JOT, Rautava P, Kytö V. Prognosis of patients with operated chronic subdural hematoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7020.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10992-5:

Rauhala M, Helén P, Seppä K, Huhtala H, Iverson GL, Niskakangas T, et al. Long-term excess mortality after chronic subdural hematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(6):1467-78.

DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04278-w:

Samo AA, Laghari ZA, Baig NM, Khoso GM.

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Hepatitis B and C in Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;104(3):1101-5.

DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1228:

Gaist D, García Rodríguez LA, Hellfritzsch M, Poulsen FR, Halle B, Hallas J, et al. Association of Antithrombotic Drug Use With Subdural Hematoma Risk. JAMA. 2017;317(8):836-46.

DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.0639:

Amirjamshidi A, Eftekhar B, Abouzari M, Rashidi A. The relationship between Glasgow coma/outcome scores and abnormal CT scan findings in chronic subdural hematoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109(2):152-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.07.007:

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Articles