Craniovertebral Junctional Injuries and Management

Authors

  • Fauzia Sajjad Department of Neurosurgery Unit II Lahore General Hospital
  • KHALID, MEHMOOD Department of Neurosurgery Unit II,
  • MUHAMMAD ANWAR CHAUDHRY Department of Neurosurgery Unit II
  • Zafar Iqbal Department of Neurosurgery Unit II
  • Nauman Shakeel Department of Neurosurgery Unit II

Abstract

Objective: Craniocervical junction injuries are less common. They are unique in their presentation and need specialized management. The objective was to determine diagnosis initial management and ultimate surgical procedures performed and efficacy of these procedures.
Materials and Methods: A five year study from April 2003 to Oct. 2008 was conducted at department of neurosurgery unit II Lahore general hospital Lahore. A total of fifteen patients were included. All patients with upper cervical trauma with all modes of injuries were included irrespective of their age and sex. All patients were evaluated with routine X-rays cervical spine, anterioposterior, lateral and open mouth views. While dynamic views were advised only in those having osodontoideum. C.T with saggital reconstruction and MRI were performed in all patients to further augment and detect bony and soft tissue details. In all modes of injuries we maintain their airway breathing and circulation.
Clinical Presentation: Out of total fifteen patients mostly were young in their twenties and thirtees, only two patients (13.33%) were below twenty and one patient (6.66%) was above fourty years. The main culprit was road traffic accident in most of patients (thirteen patients 80%) followed by fall in two patients (13.33%) and assault in one patient (6.66%). The odontoid fracture with reductable atlantoaxial instability was appeared to the most common problem in five patients (33.33%). In two patients (13.33%) transverse ligament found to be intact. In two other cases (13.33%) atlas fracture was simultaneously found. Osodontoideum detected in two patients (13.33%) while basilar invagination seen in one patient (6.66%). Irreducable atlantoaxial instability was seen in three patients (20%). Out of fifteen patients, three patients (20%) were neurologically intact, while one patient (6.66%) had complete injury. Eleven patients (73%) had partial injury.
Surgical Procedures: In order to achieve stability, we performed posterior instrumentation and bony fusion in all nine reducible injury patients (60%). Atlanto axial fusion performed in seven patients (46.66%), while in two patients (13.33%) having concomitant C1 injury occipitocervical fusion was done. Initial transoral decompres-sion, prior to posterior fusion was done in all four (26.66%) non reducible injury patients. Transodontoid screw fixation was done in two patients (13.33%) having intact transverse ligament.
Outcome: Overall 07 (46.66%) cases revealed excellent results all recovered without any complication. Four (26.66%) cases had some complication but recovered within 02 weeks and result was labeled as good. Two cases who had neurological deterioration, recovered slowly within 03 months. Recovery was labeled as fair. One patient who suffered neurological deterioration did not recovered and result was labeled as poor.
Complications: One patient (6.66%) died after severe chest infection, although severe chest infection observed in three patients (20%). Mild wound infection and wound dehiscence seen in one patient (6.66%) each. These patients managed conservatively successfully. Neurological deterioration observed in three patients (20%), out of them two patients (13.66%) improved with 3 months.

References

1. Mendle E, Henstschel SJ, Guiot BH, Injuries to cervical Spine. In, Principal of Neurosurgeryby Rengachary SS, Ellenhogan RG, PP: 369-80.
2. Aldy R, Lobato RD, Gomez P, Cervical spine fractures; In, Manual of Neurosurgery, James DP, PP: 723-30.
3. G.Y. El-Khoury, D.L. Bennett and G.J. Ondr, Multi-detector-row computed tomography, J Am Acad Ortho Surg 2004; 12: pp. 1–5.
4. C. Van Gilder, A.H. Menezes and K.D. Dolan, Radio-logy of the normal craniovertebral junction. In: J.C. Van Gilder, A.H. Menezes and K.D. Dolan, Editors, The Craniovertebral Junction and Its Abnormalities, Futura, New York, NY 1987: pp. 29–68.
5. Tranlis VC, Kaufman HH, Atlanto-occipital disloca-tion: In Rengachary SS, Neurosurgery 2nd Edition Vol. 2BPP; 2871-90.
6. Zavanone M, Guerra P, Rampini P, et al. Traumatic fractures of the craniovertebral junction. Management of 23 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 1991; 35: 17-22.
7. Fairholm D, Lee ST, Lui TN. Fractured odontoid: The management of delayed neurological symptoms. Neuro-surgery 1996; 38: 38-43.
8. Wertheim SB, Bohlman HH. Occipitocervical fusion. Indications, technique, and long-term results in thirteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 833–836.9. GeislerFH Cheng C, Poka A, et al. Anterior screw fixa-tion of posteriorly displaced type II odontoid fractures. Neurosurgery 1989; 25: 30–37; Discussion 37-38.
10. Clark CR White AA 3rd. Fractures of the dens. A mul-ticenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1340–1348.
11. Braun JP, Traumatic and posttraumatic lesions of crani-overtebral junction, Radiologe 1978, Feb; 18 (2): 58-61.
12. Borm W, Kast E, Richter HP, et al. Anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures: Is there a dif-
ference in outcome between age groups? Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 1089–1092; Discussion 1084–1092.
13. Schatzker J, Rorabeck CH, Waddell JP. Fractures of the dens (odontoid process). An analysis of thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971; 53: 392-405.
14. Anderson S, Rodrigues M, Olerud C. Odontoid frac-tures: High complication rate associated with anterior screw fixation in the elderly. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: 56-59.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-05

Issue

Section

Original Articles