Early Versus Late Tracheotomy in Patients with Severe Head Injury

Authors

  • Yasir-ud-Din Hoti Department of Neurosurgery Unit II PGMI / Lahore General Hospital
  • MUHAMMAD IRFAN Department of Neurosurgery Unit II, PGMI
  • AMIR AZIZ Department of Neurosurgery Unit II, PGMI
  • AAMER UDDIN HOTI Department of Neurosurgery Unit II, PGMI
  • Khurram Ishaque Department of Neurosurgery Unit II

Keywords:

Endotracheal, tracheostomy, conservatively, ventilatory support

Abstract

Objective: A majority of patients with severe head injury whether treated conservatively or being operated, need ventilatory support and require endotracheal intubation. There has been a great discussion regarding the timing of tracheostomy. In this study we observed our admitted patients with severe head injury and noted the role of early tracheostomy in the outcome of these patients.
Material and Method: This study included 50 cases of severe head injury presenting in the emergency department of Neurosurgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore.
Study Duration: The study duration was two years from October 2010 to October 2012.
Study Design: Prospective and analytic study.
Results: A total of 50 patients with no sex predilection, ages ranging from 10 years to 60 years were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A, having 25 patients who underwent tracheostomy earlier and Group B, having 25 patients in whom tracheostomy was done late. According to the timing of tracheostomy, patients were classified as early group A (? 7 days; N = 25) or late group B (> 7 days; N = 25). The average time of the tracheostomy procedure was 5.5 ± 1.8 (SD) days in the early group and 11.0 ± 4.3 days in the late group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, proportion of female sex, GCS, Injury Severity Score, or need for blood transfusion. However, patients in the early group had a significantly shorter stay in the ICU than patients in the late group (19.76 ± 4.4 vs. 28.9 ± 5.6 days; P = 0.0000001). There was no difference between the groups in ventilator days (15.7 ± 6.0 vs. 20.0 ± 16.0 days; p = 0.57) data not shown. There were significant differences between the groups regarding overall mortality 4% vs. 24%; p = 0.041332. Similarly, significant recovery (p = 0.04) was observed in early tracheostomy patients when compared with group B. Conclusion: Early tracheostomy was beneficial, resulting in a shorter ICU stay and decreasing the overall mortality.

References

1. Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld
GD: Implications of extubation delay in brain –
injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am
J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 1530-1536.
2. Hsieh AH, Bishop MJ, Kubilis PS, Newell DW, Pierson
DJ: Pneumonia following closed head injury. Am
Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146: 290-294.
3. Armstrong PA, McCarthy MC, Peoples JB: Reduced
use of resources by early tracheostomy in ventilator –
dependent patients with blunt trauma. Am Surg 1998;
124: 763-766.
4. Major KM, Hui T, Wilson MT, Gaon MD, Shabot MM,
Margulies DR: Objective indications for early tracheostomy
after blunt head trauma. Am J Surgery 2003; 186:
615-619.
5. Sugerman HJ, Wolfe L, Pasquale MD, Rogers FB,
O'Malley KF, Knudson M, Di Nardo L, Gordon M,
Schaffer S: Multicenter, randomized, prospective trial
of early tracheostomy. J Trauma 1997; 43: 741-747.
6. Stocchetti N, Parma A, Lamperti M, Songa V, Tognini
L: Neurophysiological consequences of three tracheostomy
techniques: a randomized study in neurosurgical
patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2000; 12: 307-313.
7. Ahmed N, Kuo YH. Early versus late tracheostomy in
patients with severe traumatic head injury. Surg Infect
(Larchmt) 2007; 8: 343-7.
8. Goettler CE, Fugo JR, Bard MR, Newell MA, Sagraves
SG, Toschlog EA, et al. Predicting the need for early
tracheostomy: A multifactorial analysis of 992 incubated
trauma patients. J Trauma 2006; 60: 991-6.
9. Chintamani , Khanna J, Singh JP, Kulshreshtha P, Kalra
P, Priyambada B, et al. Early tracheostomy in closedhead injuries: Experience at a tertiary center in a deve-loping country – a prospective study. BMC Emerg Med 2005; 5: 8. 10. Elias B. Rizk and Akshal S. Patel, Department of Neu-rosurgery; Christina M. Stetter and Vernon M. Chin-chilli, Department of Public Health Sciences.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-09

Issue

Section

Original Articles