Caries Spine: A Comparative Study between Medical Management Alone with Combined Medical and Surgical Management

Authors

  • Syed Saleem Shah Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi.
  • Farrukh Javeed Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi.
  • Lal Rehman Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi.
  • Ali Afzal, FCPS Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8388-5427
  • Munwar Ali Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi.
  • Shakeel Ahmed Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v24i3.428

Keywords:

Caries spine, Anti tuberculous therapy, , Surgical treatment

Abstract

Objective:  To compare short term outcome of combined surgical and medical management versus medical management alone in caries spine.
Material and Methods:  This study was conducted from August 2015 to August 2018, on 68 patients randomly divided into two groups of 34 each. All were diagnosed cases of Caries spine based on history, clinical examination, ESR and imaging appearances. Group A underwent surgical intervention along with Anti-Tuberculous Treatment (ATT) while Group B received medical treatment (ATT) alone. 

Results:  There were 37 (54.41%) males and 31 (45.59%) females with mean age of 34.84 ± 10.6 years. The thoracic spine was the commonest site in 33 (48.5%) patients, followed by lumbar in 20 (20.8%), dorso-lumbar in seven (10.3%) and cervical in four (5.88%) patients. The ESR fell from 85mm/hr to 24.46mm/hr in Group A and to 41.92mm/hr in Group B (p = 0.0124). Overall improvement in Frankel grade was seen in 25 (73.5%) patients in Group A and 12 (35.3%) in group B. In group A, improvement seen from grade A in two (8%), grade B in three (12%), grade C in 12(48%), Grade D in seven (28%) patients, (p = 0.000) while eight (23.5%) patients remained same and only one (2.5%) deteriorated from baseline neurological status. In Group B, 16 (47%) patients remained same and six (17.6%) deteriorated. 
Conclusion:  Surgery combined with antituberculous therapy was found to be beneficial in patients suffering from caries spine and to be recommended to patients desiring rapid recovery

References

1. Yudoyono F, Dahlan RH, Ompusunggu SE, Arifin MZ. Cervical Spine Intramedullary Tuberculoma; case report. NAAS January, 2014; 10 (5005): 180-82.
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Or¬ganization; c2014 [cited 2016 Aug 29]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/ 137094/1/9789241564809_eng.pdf?ua=1.
3. Moon MS. Tuberculosis of Spine: Current Views in Diagnosis and Management. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8 (1): 97–111. Doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.1.97
4. Devi KR, Bhutia R, Bhowmick S, Mukherjee K, Mahanta J, Narain K. Genetic Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Assam, India: Dominance of Beijing Family and Discovery of Two New Clades Related to CAS1_Delhi and EAI Family Based on Spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR Typing. PLoS ONE, 2015; 10 (12): e0145860.
Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145860
5. González-Martín J, García-García JM, Anibarro L, Vidal R, Esteban J, Blanquer R et al. [Consensus document on the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of tuberculosis]. Arch Bronconeumol. 2010; 46 (5): 255-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.02.010.
6. Terry CS, ?James H. Beaty, Hodgson AR, Stock FE. Anterior spinal fusion: a preliminary communication on the radical treatment of Pott's disease and Pott's paraplegia. Br J Surg Medical. 2012; 44: 266.
7. Chen YH. Clinical features and outcomes of spinal tuberculosis in southern Taiwan. J MicrobiolImmunol Infect. 2012; 43 (4): 291-300. DOI: 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60046-1
8. Ningkui N, Wang Q. ‘Clinical and genomic responses to ultra-short course chemotherapy in spinal tuberculosis Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2017; 13: 1681-1688. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4170.
9. Turgut M. Spinal tuberculosis (Pott's disease): its clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcome. A survey study on 694 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2001; 24 (1): 8-13.
10. Jin W, Wang Q, Wang Z, Geng G. Complete debridement for treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis: a clinical curative effect observation. The Spine J. 2014; 14 (6): 964–970.
Doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.466.
11. Jiang T, Zhao J, He M, Wang K, Fowdur M, Wu Y. Outcomes and Treatment of Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Study of 53 Patients. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10 (6): e0130185.
Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130185.
12. Robert G, Jeffrey A, Avery B, Ori D, Therese M, Heather L. et al. Trial of Short-Course Antimicrobial
13. Hussain I, Khan A, Haroon A, Vohra AH. Surgical Outcome of Anterior Decompression, Grafting and Fixation in Caries of Dorsolumbar Spine. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015; 25 (10): 730-33.
14. Ahsan K, Sakeb N. ‘Single-stage posterior instrumentation for progressive tubercular thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis.’ J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016; 24 (3): 344-349. DOI: 10.1177/1602400314.
15. Pan Z, Luo J, Yu L, Chen Y, Zhong J, Li Z1, et al. ‘Débridement and Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in Kyphotic Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis.’ Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475 (8): 2084-2091. Doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5306-9. Epub 2017; 6.
16. Jutte PC, van Loenhout-Rooyackers JH. ‘Routine surgery in addition to chemotherapy for treating spinal tuberculosis.’ Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 25: (5): CD004532.
Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004532.pub2.
17. Bhandari A, Garg RK, Malhotra HS, Verma R, Singh MK, Jain A, Sharma PK. Outcome assessment in conservatively managed patients with cervical spine tuberculosis. Spinal Cord, 2014; 52: 489–493.
Doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.49.
18. Kadota T, Matsui H, Hirose T, Suzuki J, Saito M, Akaba T, Analysis of drug treatment outcome in clarithromycin-resistant Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease. BMC Infectious Diseases BMC series – open, inclusive and trusted, 2016; 16(1): 31.
Doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1384-7.
19. Zhong W, Xiong G, Wang B, Lu C, Dai Z, Lv G. Surgical Management for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis Posterior Only versus Anterior Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (3): 1-10. e0119759. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119759.
20. Singh S, Kumaraswamy V, Sharma N, Saraf SK, Khare GN. Evaluation of Role of Anterior Debridement and Decompression of Spinal Cord and Instrumentation in Treatment of Tubercular Spondylitis. Asian Spine J. 2012; 6 (3): 183-93.
21. Su HH, Tsai WC, Lin CY, Lin WR, Chen TC, Lu PL.
et al Clinical Features and Outcomes of Spinal Tuberculosis in Southern Taiwan. J MicrobiolImmunol Infect. 2010; 43 (4): 291–300.
DOI: 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60046-1.
22. Kandwal P, Garg B, Upendra B, Chowdhury B, Jayaswal A. Outcome of minimally invasive surgery in the management of tuberculous spondylitis. Indian J Orthop. 2012; 46: 159-164.
Doi:10.4103/0019-5413.93680.
23. Turgut M. Spinal tuberculosis (Pott’s disease): its clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcome. A survey study on 694 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2001; 24: 8-13.
24. Kapoor SK, Agarwal PN, Jain BK Jr, Kumar R. Video-assisted tharacoscopic decompression of tubercular spondylitis: clinical evaluation. Spine, (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: E605-E610.
25. Jain A, Jain RK, Kiyawat V. ’Evaluation of Outcome of Transpedicular Decompression and Instrumented Fusion in Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis’ Asian Spine J. 2017; 11 (1): 31-36. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.1.31.
26. Osmanagic A, Emamifar A, Bang JC, Hansen IMJ. A Rare Case of Pott’s Disease (Spinal Tuberculosis) Mimicking Metastatic Disease in the Southern Region of Denmark. Am J Case Rep. 2016; 17: 384–388.. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.897555.
27. Mirkooh M, Vaccaro AR, Yarandi KK, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Spinal Tuberculosis: Diagnosis and management. Asian Spine J. 2012; 6 (4): 294-308. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.4.294.
28. Ekinci S, Tatar E, Akpancar S, Bilgic S, Ersen O. Spinal Tuberculosis J of Exp Erim Ental Neuroscience, 2015; 9: 89-90. DOI: 10.4137/JEN.S32842.
29. Varatharajah S, Charles YP, Buy X, Walter A, Steib JP. Orthopaedics& Traumatology: Surgery & Research: Update on the surgical management of Pott's disease. Otho & Traumsurg Research, 2014; 100 (2): 233–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.09.013

Downloads

Published

2020-09-25

Issue

Section

Original Articles