Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: Results with Zero-Profile Spacer/Cage
Objective: Study provides proof to support the promised benefits of employing stand-alone zero-profile cages in multilevel ACDF procedures, as the stand-alone zero-profile device has proven safety and a reduction of the risk of dysphagia in single-level ACDF surgeries.
Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study, conducted at the Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan. Data of 36 patients evaluated for post-operative dysphagia and fusion, who had multi-level ACDF surgery employing stand-alone zero-profile cages.
Results: Total of 36 patients underwent ACDF surgeries. 86.1% (31/36) patients operated for 2 levels and 13.9% (5/36) patients operated for 3 levels. Dysphagia developed postoperatively in 2 (5.6%) patients in which zero-profile stand-alone cages were used. Fusion was achieved in 94.4% (34/36) patients.
Conclusion: Stand-alone zero-profile cages in multi-level ACDF surgeries have a good outcome in terms of post-operative less dysphagia and higher fusion rates.
Keywords: Anterior Cervical Discectomy (Decompression) And Fusion (ACDF), Zero-Profile Cages, Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Bartolomei JC, Theodore N, Sonntag VK. Adjacent level degeneration after anterior cervical fusion: a clinical review. Neurosurgery Clinics, 2005; 16 (4): 575-87.
Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine, 2002; 27 (22): 2453-8.
Chen Y, Chen H, Cao P, Yuan W. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion. European Spine Journal, 2015; 24 (8): 1666-72.
Chen Y, Liu Y, Chen H, Cao P, Yuan W. Comparison of curvature between the zero-P spacer and traditional cage and plate after 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clinical Spine Surgery, 2017; 30 (8): E1111-6.
Clavenna AL, Beutler WJ, Gudipally M, Moldavsky M, Khalil S. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study. The Spine Journal, 2012; 12 (2): 157-63.
Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, Vaccaro AR, Brodke DS, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Woodard EJ. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. JBJS. 2013; 95 (18): 1651-8.
Kaiser MG, Haid Jr RW, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts Jr GE. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery, 2002; 50 (2): 229-38.
Kasimatis GB, Panagiotopoulos E, Gliatis J, Tyllianakis M, Zouboulis P, Lambiris E. Complications of anterior surgery in cervical spine trauma: an overview. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2009; 111 (1): 18-27.
Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW. Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate? Spine, 2015 5; 40 (10): E563-70.
Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an
anterior cervical plate. JBJS. 2005; 87 (3): 558-63.
Pereira EA, Chari A, Hempenstall J, Leach JC, Chandran H, Cadoux-Hudson TA. Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2013; 20 (9): 1250-5.
Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Štulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L, Kucera R, Vyskocil T, Steudel WI. Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates: two-year results of a multi-centric, randomized, controlled study. Spine, 2009; 34 (7): 641-6.
Qi M, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liang L, Yuan W. The use of a zero-profile device compared with an anterior plate and cage in the treatment of patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis: a preliminary clinical investigation. The Bone & Joint Journal, 2013; 95 (4): 543-7.
Cloward RB. Cervical diskography: Technique, indications, and use in diagnosis of ruptured cervical disks. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nuclear Med. 1958; 79: 563-74.
Sahjpaul RL. Esophageal perforation from anterior cervical screw migration. Surgical Neurology, 2007; 68 (2): 205-9.
Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F. A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine, 2015; 40 (7): E375-80.
Shousha M, Ezzati A, Boehm H. Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation. European Spine Journal, 2012; 21 (12): 2512-9.
Wu JC, Ko CC, Yen YS, Huang WC, Chen YC, Liu L, Tu TH, Lo SS, Cheng H. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurgical Focus, 2013; 35 (1): E10.
Copyright (c) 2022 Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.