Outcome of autologous bone graft versus polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery

Authors

  • Mubashir Malik Department of Neurosurgery, PINS, Lahore.
  • Shehzad Safdar Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS) Lahore, Pakistan
  • Zubair Ahmed Khan Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS) Lahore, Pakistan
  • Amir Aziz Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS) Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rizwan Masood Butt Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS) Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Naveed Majeed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.678

Keywords:

Key Words: ACDF, PEEK cages, Autologous Bone, graft

Abstract

Objective:
To compare the outcome of autologous bone graft versus PEEK cages in ACDF surgery in terms of clinical performance and radiographic features.

Methodology:
This study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan from April 2020 to December 2022. In this study patients were randomized into two equal groups i.e. Group A (autologous bone graft)  and Group B (PEEK cage).

Results:
Total of 98 patients was included in the study. The mean age of cases was 49.88 ± 17.83 years. There were 58(59.18%) male and 40(40.82%) female cases. 25(25.51%) cases who had C3-C4 involved, 48(48.98%) patients had C5-C6 and 25(25.51%) cases had C5 region involved. The mean disc height at 6th months in PEEK group was 6.71 ± 0.46 mm and in bone graft group was 6.33 ± 0.47 mm, p-value < 0.05. The mean operative time in PEEK group (2.07 ± 0.42) was statistically less than bone graft group (3.23 ± 0.36), p-value < 0.05. The average blood loss was also statistically less in PEEK group as compared to bone graft.  The mean hospital stay in PEEK group was 2.92 ± 0.61 days as compared to bone graft was 5.48 ± 1.90 days, p-value < 0.05.

Conclusion:
Outcome of ACDF surgery PEEK cages are better than autologous bone graft in terms of clinical performance and radiological features. Hence PEEK cages can be opted in future to have better outcome and higher patient’s satisfaction.

 

References

Liu JM, Xiong X, Peng AF, Xu M, Chen XY, Long XH, Xu R, Liu ZL. A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;155:30-5.

Chen F, He W, Mahaney K, Noeller J, Mhanna N, Viljoen S, Torner J, Hitchon P. Alternative grafts in anterior cervical fusion. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2013 Oct 1;115(10):2049-55.

Galhom AE. Comparison between Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages versus an iliac-crest autograft used in treatment of single or double level anterior cervical discectomy. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2013 Mar 9;81(2).

Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov 1;28(32):4845-69.

Kersten RF, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A, Öner FC. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. The Spine Journal. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1446-60.

Perrini P, Cagnazzo F, Benedetto N, Morganti R, Gambacciani C. Cage with anterior plating is advantageous over the stand-alone cage for segmental lordosis in the treatment of two-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017 Dec 1;163:27-32.

Pelletier MH, Cordaro N, Punjabi VM, Waites M, Lau A, Walsh WR. PEEK versus Ti interbody fusion devices: resultant fusion, bone apposition, initial and 26-week biomechanics. Clinical spine surgery. 2016 May 1;29(4):E208-14.

Liu JM, Xiong X, Peng AF, Xu M, Chen XY, Long XH, Xu R, Liu ZL. A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;155:30-5.

Junaid M, Rashid MU, Afsheen A, Bukhari SS, Kalsoom A. Experience with titanium cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2016 Mar 10;28(1):47-51.

Maharaj MM, Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) autograft versus graft substitutes: what do patients prefer?—a clinical study. Journal of Spine Surgery. 2016 Jun;2(2):105.

Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson Jr JS. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine. 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7.

Jacobs W, Willems PC, van Limbeek J, Bartels R, Pavlov P, Anderson PG, Oner FC. Single or double?level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011(1).

Chau AM, Xu LL, Wong JH, Mobbs RJ. Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine. Neurosurgical review. 2014 Jan;37(1):23-37.

Mobbs RJ, Maharaj M, Rao PJ. Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 Dec 1;21(6):867-76.

Epstein NE, Schwall G, Reillly T, Insinna T, Bahnken A, Hood DC. Surgeon choices, and the choice of surgeons, affect total hospital charges for single-level anterior cervical surgery. Spine. 2011 May 15;36(11):905-9.

Hacker RJ, Cauthen JC, Gilbert TJ, Griffith SL. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage.

Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA, Barone D, Brotea C. Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar 1;50(3):510-7.

Galhom AE. Comparison between Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages versus an iliac-crest autograft used in treatment of single or double level anterior cervical discectomy. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2013 Mar 9;81(2).

Alobidi DS, Obidi FA. Anatomical Cervical Cage Versus Autologous Bone Graft for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion In Patients with Cervical Disc Degeneration. Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2014;13(3).

Wang M, Chou D, Chang CC, Hirpara A, Liu Y, Chan AK, Pennicooke B, Mummaneni PV. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using structural allograft or polyetheretherketone: pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates with minimum 2-year follow-up. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2019 Dec 13;32(4):562-9.

Ha SK, Park JY, Kim SH, Lim DJ, Kim SD, Lee SK. Radiologic assessment of subsidence in stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2008 Dec;44(6):370.

Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. The Spine Journal. 2007 Mar 1;7(2):205-9.

Lied B, Roenning PA, Sundseth J, Helseth E. Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage). BMC surgery. 2010 Dec;10(1):1-9.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Original Articles