Management and Outcome of Compound Depressed Skull Fracture

Authors

  • SHABIR AHMED LEHRI
  • RAZ MUHAMMAD BAZAI
  • SYED FAREED-UD-DIN et al

Abstract

Objectives:  To determine the clinical presentation, management and outcome of patients presenting with compound depressed skull fracture.

Study Design:  Descriptive study.

Place and Duration of Study:  Bolan Medical Complex Hospital Duration from May 2003 to March 2006.

Materials and Methods:  Study conducted on sixty patients with compound depressed skull fracture. Patients of both gender and all age group were included in the study, those with major life threatening injuries to other organs were excluded.

Results:  Out of total of 60 patients, 42 (70%) patients were male and 18 (30%) were female. Majority were in the first (33%) second (25%) decade of life (child and young patients). Most of patients were injured as a result of road traffic accidents 32 (53%), fall from height in 16 patients (27%) and assault in 12 (20%). Seventy percent of patients in fall group fell from roof while 30% from electric pool. Patients presented with various signs and symptoms like headache, vomiting (70%), loss of consciousness (33%), ear, nose and throat bleed (40%), CSF rhinorrhea (17%) and fits. Seventy percent of patients in this study presented with sings of raised intracranial pressure. Temporal region was the most frequently affected area in 30 (50%) cases. 

Conclusion:  Children and yuoung adults and males are most commonly affected. Road traffic accidents and falls from height are the most common modes of head injury. If treated properly most cases of compound depressed fracture will reveal good results.

 

References

Naimur – rehman, Jamjoom Zaab. Skull fracture classi-fication and management. Brit J. Neurosurgery 1994; 8: 667-79.

Heary RF, Hunt CD, Kriger Al, Schurder M. Vaid C, Non-surgical treatment of compound depresses skull fracture. J. Trauma. 1993 (Sep, 35 (3): 44 1-7).

Garislar FH, Manson PN. Traumatic skull and facial fractures. Rangachuy SS. Wilkins RH. Edits in princi-ple of neurosurgery, Mosley, Wolf, 1994: 18-2-18.6.

Chondrasekaran S, Zainal J Delayed Traumatic extra-dual haematoma. Aust NZJ Surg 1993; 63 (10): 810-3.

Lindsay KW, Bone 1, Cailander R, Depress skull frac-tures edits In; Neurology and Neurosurgery illustrated, 3td edition, 1 998, London. Churchil II Livingstone, pp: 229.

Broumond SR, Labs JD. The role of three dimensional CT in the evaluration of acure craniofacial trauma. Anss Plast Surg 1993; 31 (6): 488-94.

Jennett B, Bond M, Assessment of out come after seve-re brain damage : a Practical scale. Lancet. 1975; 1: 480-484.

Thomas LM. Skull Fracture in Ramgchay SS, Wilkins W (ed) Neurosurgery 1623-1626 New York 1985.

Murshid WR; Role 2) skull radiograph in initial evaluation of minor head injury, a retrospective study. Act a Neurochuir (wien) 1994; 129 (1-2): 11-4.66 (4): 506-10.

Siddiqi AA, Zafar H, Bashir SH, An audit of head tra-uma care and mortality; J. coil Physicians Surg. Pak 2004, Mar; 14 (3): 173-7.

Curry Di, Frim DM, Delayed repaired of open depress skull fracture, Pediatr.Neurosurg. 1999 Dec; 31 (6): 294-7.

Al–Haddad SA, Kiroliar R, A 5 year's study of outcome of surgically trated depresses skull fractures. Ann R. Coil Surg. Engl. 2002, May; 84 (3): 196-200.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-09

Issue

Section

Original Articles