Efficacy of Discectomy by Fenestration Technique in Lumbar Radicular Pain

Authors

  • RIAZ UR REHMAN Department of Neurosurgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex
  • MUSHTAQ
  • AZMATULLAH KHATTAK et al

Abstract

Objectives:  To know the efficacy of disc excision by fenestration method for the relief of lumbar radicular pain in patients with prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Material and Methods:  This descriptive study was conducted in the department of Neurosurgery of Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from October 2008 to September 2010. All those patients were included in whom straight leg raising (SLR) sign was less than 60 degree and prolapsed disc at L4 – 5 or L5 – S1 levels on MRI. Patients with multiple level discs, previous history of spine surgery, central disc, evidence of lumbar stenosis and cauda equina syndrome were excluded from this study. All patients were operated in prone position under general anesthesia. 

Results:  One hundred and nine patients were studied. 66 (55%) were male and 59 (45%) were female patients. Age rang was from 19 to 52 years with mean age 34.31 years. The commonest level of involvement was L 4 -L 5 in 67 (61%) followed by L5 – S1 in 42 (89%). Sixty five patients had left sided while forty four had right sided symptoms. Majority of patients presented in Dennis pain scale 4 i.e. 67% (n = 73). 

Conclusion:  In selected patients with prolapsed intervertebral disc, surgical treatment provides quick pain relief. Fenestration with disc excision is quite a reasonable method to surgically treat the indicated cases of prolapsed disc. Fenestration offers complete visualization of nerve root and complete removal of the offending disc. This procedure does not need greater expertise, sophisticated instrumentation and techniques.

References

Harry B. Skinner. Diseases and disorders of the lumbar spine. Current Diagnosis and treatment in Orthopedics. Second Edition. McGraw Hill, Singapore 2003: 195-201.

Jooma R, Mamon R.A practical approach to the mana-gement of low back pain.J Med Sci 2001; 17: 197-201.

Cypress BK. Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms : A National Perspective. Am J Public Heal-th. 1983; 73: 389-95.

Sangwan SS, Kundu ZS, Singh R, Kamboj P, Siwach RC, Aggarwal P. Lumbar disc excision through fenes-tration. Indian J Orthop 2006; 40: 86-9.

Babu MKV.Surgical management of lumbar disc pro-lapse by fenestration technique orthopaedics; 2006: 3e6.

Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 1934; 211: 210-4.

Love JG. Root pain resulting from intraspinal protru-sion of vertebral discs : diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg.1939; 19: 776-80.

Garg M, Kumar S. Interlaminar discectomy and selec-tive foraminotomy in lumbar disc herniation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2001 Dec; 9 (2): 15-18.

Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endo-scopy and discectomy : State of the art. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000; 67 (4): 327-332.

Ahmad N, Mahmood A, Ahmad I, Shafi K, Aziz A. Immediate relief of lumber redicular painafter surgical excision of prolapsed inter vertebral disc. JPOA. 2010; 22 (1): 1-6.

Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgical interventions for lum-bar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views 2007; Issue 2. Art No: CD001350.

O'Connell JEA. Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1951; 33: 8-30.

Devkota UP1, Lohani S2, Joshi RM3. Minimally inva-sive open lumbar discectomy : An alternative to micro-lumbar discectomy. KUMJ. 2009; 7 (3): 204-208.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-09

Issue

Section

Original Articles