Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) Shunt at Choudhary’s Point vs. Keen’s Point

Authors

  • Rana Zubair Mahmood Neurosurgery Unit-2, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore Pakistan
  • Faheem Ahmed Usmani
  • Mukhtiyar Ahmed Lakho
  • Talha Abbas
  • M. Yasin Khan
  • Sarfraz Khan
  • Touqeer Ahmed Neurosurgery Unit-2, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences (PINS), Lahore Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i2.760

Keywords:

ventriculoperitoneal, Post Operative Day, Cerebro Spinal Fluid, Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy, External Ventricular Drain

Abstract

Objectives:  The study compared the outcomes of VP shunt at Choudhary’s vs Keen’s point.

Material and Methods:  A quasi-observational study was conducted on 50 patients who presented to NS-2, PINS, with the complaint of hydrocephalus. The study was conducted for 3 months from 1st November 2021 to 31th Jan 2022.

Results:  Mean age was 40 years. In 25 (50%) patients, VP shunts were done through Choudhary’s point while in 25 (50%) patients VP shunts were done through Keen’s point. All patients were evaluated on day 3rd POD, 7th POD, 15th POD, and 90th POD.  All patients were improved on 3rd POD. On the 7th POD, 15 (30%) patients deteriorated and showed signs of raised ICP. In these patients, the upper end of VP shunts is again revised due to blockage. On 15th POD, the upper end of VP shunts was blocked in 3 (6%) patients and their upper end was revised. On 90th POD, 2 (4%) patients were presented with upper-end blockage, and again shunt revision was done.  VP shunts in all these patients were done through keen’s point approach. Blockage of the lower end of VP shunt occurred in 10% of patients in which 8% were operated through Keen’s point approach while resting 2% of patients were operated through Choudhary’s point approach. 

Conclusion:  VP shunts through Choudhary’s point approach yield good results as compared to Keen's point approach. This site is described by professor Muhammad Anwar Choudhary, as more convenient for insertion of VP shunt.

References

Stevenson DK, Benitz WE, Sunshine P, Hintz SR, Druzin ML, editors. Fetal and neonatal brain injury. Cambridge University Press; 2017 Dec. 21.

Kahle KT, Kulkarni AV, Limbrick Jr DD, Warf BC. Hydrocephalus in children. The lancet. 2016 Feb. 20; 387 (10020): 788-99.

Abdulrauf SI, Ellenbogen RG, Sekhar LN. Principles of neurological surgery. Elsevier, 2012: 3-6.

Ferri FF. Ferri's clinical advisor 2018 E-Book: 5 Books in 1. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017 May 25.

Melnick M. Dorland's Electronic Medical Dictionary, Philadelphia, PA 19106, WB Saunders Co., 2000. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 2000 Oct. 1; 14 (2): 50-1.

Yadav YR, Parihar V, Sinha M. Lumbar peritoneal shunt. Neurology India, 2010; 58 (2): 179.

Burton A. Infant hydrocephalus in Africa: spreading some good news. The Lancet Neurology, 2015; 14 (8): 789-90.

Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Zuckerman SL, Tubbs RS, Singer RJ. Craniometrics and ventricular access: a review of Kocher's, Kaufman's, Paine's, Menovksy's, Tubbs’, Keen's, Frazier's, Dandy's, and Sanchez's points. Operative Neurosurgery, 2020; 18 (5): 461-9.

Frazier CH. Operation for the radical cure of trigeminal neuralgia: analysis of five hundred cases. Annals of Surgery, 1928 Sep; 88 (3): 534.

Jandial R, Aizenberg MR, Chen M. 100 Case Reviews in Neurosurgery E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016 Aug. 26.

Agarwal A, Borley N, McLatchie G, editors. Oxford handbook of operative surgery. Oxford University Press, 2017 Jun. 22.

Brook I. Meningitis and shunt infection caused by anaerobic bacteria in children. Pediatric Neurology, 2002; 26 (2): 99-105.

Shah SS, Smith MJ, Zaoutis TE. Device-related infections in children. Pediatric Clinics, 2005 Aug. 1; 52 (4): 1189-208.

James HE, Walsh JW, Wilson HD, Connor JD, Bean JR, Tibbs PA. Prospective randomized study of therapy in cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. Neurosurgery, 1980; 7 (5): 459-63.

Steinbok P, Cochrane DD. Ventriculosubgaleal shunt in the management of recurrent ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection. Child's Nervous System, 1994; 10 (8): 536-8.

Morris A, Low DE. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis, including central nervous system shunt infections. Infectious disease clinics of North America, 1999; 13 (3): 735-50.

Martínez-Lage JF, Ruíz-Espejo AM, Almagro MJ, Alfaro R, Felipe-Murcia M, López López-Guerrero A. CSF overdrainage in shunted intracranial arachnoid cysts: a series and review. Child's Nervous System, 2009; 25 (9): 1061-9.

Mancarella C, Delfini R, Landi A. Chiari malformations. New Trends in Craniovertebral Junction Surgery, 2019: 89-95.

Gkolemis C, Zogopoulos P, Kokkalis P, Stamatopoulos G, Syrmos N, Paleologos TS. Management of multiple, late onset complications in a 33-year-old female, with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and crohn's disease. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences (PJNS). 2014; 9 (3): 32-6.

Oushy S, Parker JJ, Campbell K, Palmer C, Wilkinson C, Stence NV, Handler MH, Mirsky DM. Frontal and occipital horn ratio is associated with multifocal intraparenchymal hemorrhages in neonatal shunted hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, 2017; 20 (5): 432-8.

Brownlee RD, Dold ON, Myles T. Intraventr¡ cular Hemorrhage Complicating Ventricular Catheter Revision: Incidence and Effect on Shunt Survival. Pediatric Neurosurgery, 1995; 22 (6): 315-20.

Duong J, Elia CJ, Miulli D, Dong F, Sumida A. An approach using the occipital parietal point for placement of ventriculoperitoneal catheters in adults. Surgical Neurology International, 2019; 10.

Junaid M, Ahmed M, Rashid MU. An experience with ventriculoperitoneal shunting at keen’s point for hydrocephalus. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2018; 34 (3): 691.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-12