Analyzing Spondylolisthesis in Patients with Proven Spinal Stenosis Using Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI: A Retrospective Study of Five Years

Authors

  • Mumtaz Ali
  • Akram Ullah
  • Ramzan Hussain
  • Hanif Ur Rahman
  • Sajid Khan
  • Amjad Ali
  • Abdul Haseeb Sahibzada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v28i1.955

Keywords:

Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of cases in which patients were diagnosed with lumber spinal stenosis using MRI and later were categorized as having spondylolisthesis when evaluated through plain X-rays.

Material and Methods:  This retrospective study was conducted at the Ali Institute of Neurosciences, Irfan General Hospital from 2017 to 2022. All those patients were included in the study who underwent lumbar spine MRI between 2017 and 2022 with evident findings of spinal stenosis, patients who subsequently underwent plain X-rays of the lumbar spine, and patients with available medical records and imaging data for review. While all those were excluded who did not undergo plain X-rays following MRI. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were used to summarize the categorical data while mean and standard deviation were reported for numerical data.

Results:  The mean age of the study population was 45 years, with a range from 26 to 65. Among the patients included in the study (1156), 380 were the cases missed initially on MRI and later diagnosed with spondylolisthesis on plain X-rays. This corresponds to a frequency of 33% of misdiagnosed spondylolisthesis cases based on MRI.

Conclusion:  This study highlights that the frequency of missed spondylolisthesis cases on lumbar spine MRI was one-third of the cases and the importance of additional imaging modalities, such as plain X-rays, for accurate diagnosis.

References

De C, De CJC. Impact of Concomitant Spinal Canal Stenosis on Clinical Presentation of Adult Onset Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Study Combining Clinical and Imaging Spectrum. 2021;13(11).

Farfan HJS. The pathological anatomy of degenerative spondylolisthesis. A cadaver study. 1980;5(5):412-8.

Denard PJ, Holton KF, Miller J, Fink HA, Kado DM, Marshall LM, et al. Back pain, neurogenic symptoms, and physical function in relation to spondylolisthesis among elderly men. 2010;10(10):865-73.

Segebarth B, Kurd MF, Haug PH, Davis R. Routine upright imaging for evaluating degenerative lumbar stenosis. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2015;28(10):394-7.

Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Ishii Y, et al. Changes in lumbar spondylolisthesis on axial-loaded MRI: do they reproduce the positional changes in the degree of olisthesis observed on X-ray images in the standing position? The Spine Journal. 2015;15(6):1255-62.

Binder DK, Schmidt MH, Weinstein PR, editors. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Seminars in neurology; 2002: Copyright© 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New ….

Hansen BB, Nordberg CL, Hansen P, Bliddal H, Griffith JF, Fournier G, et al., editors. Weight-bearing MRI of the lumbar spine: spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology; 2019: Thieme Medical Publishers.

Kanno H, Endo T, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Itoi E, et al. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Spine. 2012;37(16):E985-E92.

Kanno H, Ozawa H, Koizumi Y, Morozumi N, Aizawa T, Kusakabe T, et al. Dynamic change of dural sac cross-sectional area in axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine. 2012;37(3):207-13.

Segebarth B, Kurd MF, Haug PH, Davis R. Routine Upright Imaging for Evaluating Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: Incidence of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Missed on Supine MRI. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. 2015;28(10):394-7.

Trinh GM, Shao H-C, Hsieh KL-C, Lee C-Y, Liu H-W, Lai C-W, et al. Detection of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis from X-ray Images Using Deep Learning Network. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(18):5450.

Patel T, Watterson C, McKenzie-Brown AM, Spektor B, Egan K, Boorman DJJoPR. Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Progression: What is the Effect of Lumbar Medial Branch Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation on Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Progression? A Single-Center, Observational Study. 2021:1193-200.

Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine. 2009;34(2):199-205.

Karnul AA, Karnul AM, Riyaz AA, Mahjabeen H. A Cross Sectional Study On Lumbar Spondylolisthesis At L4-L5 And L5-S1 Level Vertebrae In South Karnataka Region. 2022;13(5): 2510-2519.

Prasath RA, Prashanth D, Parthasarathy K, Varghese M, Palani P, Kayarohanam S, et al. Lumbar Spondylosis: Clinical Presentation And Treatment Approaches–A Systematic Review. 2022:10384-91.

Mohile NV, Kuczmarski AS, Lee D, Warburton C, Rakoczy K, Butler AJJTJotABoFM. Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis: a guide to diagnosis and management. 2022;35(6):1204-16.

Davis R. Routine Dynamic Imaging For Evaluating Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: Incidence Of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Missed On Supine MRI. 2008:6.

Patil T, Nagalwade S, Jadhav SJIJoO. Clinical profile of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. 2020;6(2):290-2.

Wang YXJ, Kaplar Z, Deng M, Leung JCJJoOT. Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis epidemiology: a systematic review with a focus on gender-specific and age-specific prevalence. 2017;11:39-52.

Roudsari B, Jarvik JGJAJoR. Lumbar spine MRI for low back pain: indications and yield. 2010;195(3):550-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles