Comparative Analysis of Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Discectomy and Microdiscectomy in the Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Authors

  • Muhammad Farooq Farooq Neuroendscopic spine Institute,Afridi Medical Complex,Peshawar
  • Naeem ul haq Farooq Neuroendscopic spine Institute,Afridi Medical Complex,Peshawar
  • Shahid Nawaz Department of Neurosurgery, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan
  • Mumtaz Ali Ali Institute of Neurosciecnes,Irfan General Hospital Peshawar
  • Muhammad Nawaz Akhter Saeed Medical and Dental College,Lahore
  • Abdal Wasim Khan Farooq Neuroendscopic spine Institute,Afridi Medical Complex,Peshawar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v28i3.976

Abstract

Objective:  Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Discectomy and Microdiscectomy are two of the least invasive surgical procedures used in the management of lumber disc herniation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous full endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy in the management of lumber disc herniation.

Materials and Methods:  This retrospective study spanned two years. Patients with the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation confirmed by clinical symptoms and imaging studies undergoing PFED or MD were included. The primary outcome measures included pain relief, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional improvement, and measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of surgical complications and length of hospital stay.

Results:  This retrospective analysis included 480 participants in the study, with 247 patients undergoing Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Discectomy (PFED) and 233 patients undergoing Microdiscectomy (MD). In the PFED group, patients experienced an average mean reduction in leg pain score of 6.97 ±1.96 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as compared to microdiscectomy (4.95 ± 2.45).

Conclusion:  Our study concluded that both percutaneous full endoscopic discectomy and microdiscectomy are safe and efficient surgical techniques in the management of lumber disc herniation. However, PELD showed several possible benefits, such as quicker recovery and earlier LBP reductions, improvement in bowel and bladder symptoms along earlier return to work.

References

Yang C-C, Chen C-M, Lin MH-C, Huang W-C, Lee M-H, Kim J-S, et al. Complications of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2022;168:333-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.023

Khandge AV, Sharma SB, Kim J-SJWN. The evolution of transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery. 2021;145:643-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.096

Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping AJIjos. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. 2016;31:86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061

Sah RK, Li T, Shi Z, Xie J, Wang Y. Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A literature review. Sci Inventions Today. 2019;8(1):97-106.

Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Benyamin RM, Boswell MV, Buenaventura RM, et al. An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations. 2013;16(2S):S49.

Choi K-C, Shim H-K, Kim J-S, Cha KH, Lee DC, Kim ER, et al. Cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. 2019;19(7):1162-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.003

Pan L, Zhang P, Yin QJIJoS. Comparison of tissue damages caused by endoscopic lumbar discectomy and traditional lumbar discectomy: a randomised controlled trial. 2014;12(5):534-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.015

Rajamani PA, Goparaju P, Kulkarni AG, Bhojraj SY, Rajasekaran S, Chhabra HS, et al. A 2-year outcomes and complications of various techniques of lumbar discectomy: A multicentric retrospective study. 2021;156:e319-e28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.062

Ahn S-S, Kim S-H, Kim D-W, Lee B-HJWn. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for young adults: a retrospective

matched cohort study. 2016;86:250-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.047

Qin R, Liu B, Hao J, Zhou P, Yao Y, Zhang F, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus posterior open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. 2018;120:352-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236

Yao Y, Zhang H, Wu J, Liu H, Zhang Z, Tang Y, et al. Comparison of three minimally invasive spine surgery methods for revision surgery for recurrent herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. 2017;100:641-7. e1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.089

Ahn SS, Kim SH, Kim DW, Lee BH. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for young adults: a retrospective matched cohort study. World neurosurgery. 2016 Feb 1;86:250-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.047

Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: a historical perspective. Neurosurgical focus. 2004 Jan 1;16(1):1-0.

https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.16.1.14

Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for an extruded lumbar disc herniation. Pain Physician. 2013;16(1):E31.

Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping A. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. International journal of surgery. 2016 Jul 1;31:86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061

Qin R, Liu B, Hao J, Zhou P, Yao Y, Zhang F, Chen X. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus posterior open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. World neurosurgery. 2018 Dec 1;120:352-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236

Liu C, Zhou Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disk herniation. World neurosurgery. 2017 Feb 1;98:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.056

Choi KC, Jin-Sung K, Park CK. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy as an alternative to open lumbar microdiscectomy for large lumbar disc herniation. Pain physician. 2016;19(2):E291.

Ahn Y, Lee SH. Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. Acta neurochirurgica. 2010 Oct;152:1695-702.

Choi KC, Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee CD, Lee SH. Changes in back pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and annuloplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study. Pain Medicine. 2011 Nov 1;12(11):1615-21.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01250.x

Lee SH, Kang HS. Percutaneous endoscopic laser annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. World Neurosurg 2010; 73:198-206.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.01.023

Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. European Spine Journal. 2013 Nov;22:2481-7.

Jarebi M, Awaf A, Lefranc M, Peltier J. A matched comparison of outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year retrospective cohort study. The Spine Journal. 2021 Jan 1;21(1):114-21.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.005

?

Additional Information

Disclosures: Authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Review Board Approval: The research was a retrospective study.

Human Subjects: Consent was obtained by all patients/participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest:

In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Financial Relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other Relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Data Availability Statement: The data is available upon reasonable request.

Funding: This study received no specific donation from any funding association in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Sr. No. Author’s Full Name Intellectual Contribution to Paper in Terms of

Muhammad Farooq & Abdul Haseeb Sahibzada 1. Study design and methodology.

Muhammad Farooq & Shahid Nawaz 2. Paper writing.

Muhammad Farooq & Mumtaz Ali 3. Data collection and calculations.

Muhammad Farooq, Abdal Wasim Khan & Abdul Haseeb Sahibzada 4. Analysis of data and interpretation of results.

Naeem ul Haq & Muhammad Nawaz, 5. Literature review and referencing.

Muhammad Farooq & Abdul Haseeb Sahibzada 6. Editing and quality insurer.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles