Effectiveness of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Versus Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunt in Obstructive Hydrocephalus

Authors

  • Mushtaq Department of Neurosurgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Khyber Girls Medical College, Peshawar
  • Muhammad Usman Department of Neurosurgery, PAF Hospital, Fazaia Medical College, Islamabad
  • Naseer Hassan Department of Neurosurgery, Qazi Hussain Ahmad Medical Complex, Nowshera Medical College, Nowshera
  • Zahid Khan Department of Neurosurgery, Lady Reading Hospital, MTI, Peshawar
  • Seema Sharafat Department of Neurosurgery, Lady Reading Hospital, MTI, Peshawar – Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v28i3.998

Keywords:

Obstructive hydrocephalus, Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

Abstract

Objective:  To analyze the effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt for the surgical management of obstructive hydrocephalus.

Material and Methods:  The comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neurosurgery department of Lady Reading Hospital, MTI Peshawar. The duration of the study was 4 years, i.e.; August 2019 to July 2023. All the patients diagnosed as obstructive hydrocephalus because of posterior fossa tumor, aqueductal stenosis, already shunted, and tectal and non-tectal tumors were in the inclusion criteria, while patients with post-infectious hydrocephalus, congenital hydrocephalus including intra-ventricular hemorrhage and with acute hydrocephalus presenting to the emergency department were in the exclusion criteria. Analysis of the data was done by using statistical software SPSS.

Results:  There were a total of 302 patients in the study, which were divided into 2 groups; 155 patients had undergone ETY, while 147 patients had VP shunt. Successful results in the case of ETV were 71%, while in VP shunt was 66%. The complication rate was 10.32% in ETV, while 14.96% in the VP shunt group.

Conclusion:  ETV is the better substitute for VP shunt as it’s effective, with less complication rate, an economical, safe, and successful procedure in the surgical management of patients suffering from obstructive hydrocephalus.

References

Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA, Barisi I, Dolk H. Congenital hydrocephalus – prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in three European regions. Eu J Pediatr Neurol. 2010; 14 (2): 150-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.03.005

Grogorean VT, Popescu M, Sandu AM, Toader S. Ventriculoepiploic Shunt, a new surgical procedure for the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Experimental Med Surg Res. 2010; 1: 55-63.

Haq NU, Ishaq M, Jalal A. Outcome comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in obstructive hydrocephalus. Pakistan Journal of Medical &

Health Sciences. 2022;16(02):956-58.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22162956.

Brohi SR, Brohi AR, Siddiqui MA, Mughal SA, Saeed S. Outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in hydrocephalus. J Surg Pak. 2010; 15 (1): 25-8.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali-Brohi/publication/228650029_Outcome_of_endoscopic_third_ventriculostomy_in_hydrocephalus/links/59a5264845851570311b2e72/Outcome-of-endoscopic-third-ventriculostomy-in-hydrocephalus.pdf

Sufianov AA, Sufianova GZ, Iakimov IA. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients younger than 2 years, outcome analysis of 41 hydrocephallous cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010; 5: 392-401.

https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.11.peds09197

Sheikh F, Safdar S, Malik M, Rauf MA, Saleem R. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy: A Comparable Alternative to Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt for Obstructive Hydrocephalus Secondary to Infratentorial Tumors. Pak. J. of Neurol. Surg. 2021;25(4):610-8.

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v25i3.583

Reddy GK, Bollam P, Caldito G. Long-term outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2014; 81 (2): 404-410.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.096

Texakalidis P, Tora MS, Wetzel JS, Chern JJ. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus shunt for pediatric hydrocephalus: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35:1283-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04203-2

Khan HM, Haq N, Usman M, Hussain R. Audit of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the Treatment of Obstructive Hydrocephalus. Pak J Neurological Sci 2015; 10(3):27-30.

https://ecommons.aku.edu/pjns/vol10/iss3/7/

Khan HM, Usman M, Ali M, Hussain R, Naeem-Ul-Haq. Effectiveness of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in The Treatment of Obstructive Hydrocephalus. Pak. J. of Neurol. Surg 2014;18(1):44-48.

https://pakjns.org/index.php/pjns/article/view/36

Ali M, Usman M, Khan Z, Khan KM, Hussain R, Khanzada K. Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for Obstructive Hydrocephalus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2013; 23(5): 338-41.

https://www.jcpsp.pk/archive/2013/May2013/08.pdf

Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Browd SR. Use of the ETV Success Score to explain the variation in reported endoscopic third ventriculostomy success rates among published case series of childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Ped. 2011; 7 (2): 143-6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.peds10296

Dixon HZ, Hamandi YM, Mahmmoud AM, Hoz SS, Al-Sharshahi ZF. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Romanian Neurosurgery, 2020; 34 (2): 269–274.

https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2020-039

Rahmayani DD, Gunawan PI, Utomo B. Profil klinis dan faktor risiko hidrosefalus komunikans dan non komunikans pada anak di RSUD dr. Soetomo. Sari Pediatri. 2017;19(1):25-31.

https://doi.org/10.14238/sp19.1.2017.25-31

Di-Rocco C, Massimi L, Tamburrini G. Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? A review. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22(12):1573-89.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0194-4

Bouras T, Sgouros S. Complications of endoscopic

third ventriculostomy. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(2):S22-e9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.014

Ullah MA, Khan FU, Usman M, Ishaq M, Khan Z. Frequency and Pattern of Early Complications after Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Obstructive Hydrocephalus. Pak. J. of Neurol. Surg. 2020; 24(3):237-42.

https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v24i3.466

Sokal P, Birski M, Rusinek M, Paczkowski D, Zieli?ski P, Harat A. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in treatment of hydrocephalus. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech. 2012;7(4):280. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.30810

Jiang L, Gao G, Zhou Y. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt for patients with noncommunicating hydrocephalus: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018;97(42):e12139.

https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000012139

Uche EO, Okorie C, Iloabachie I, Amuta DS, Uche NJ. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in non-communicating hydrocephalus (NCH): comparison of outcome profiles in Nigerian children. Child's Nerv Syst. 2018;34:1683-9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3848-0

Downloads

Published

2024-09-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles